Equivalent touche f2 excel mac
But just as this piece completely lacks unbiased opinion, so does the noise coming from HN and the tech community in general. I've also had the feeling he was strongly biased throughout the whole article. I think you conflated customers with disciples. I bought a MBP in April this year. It was my first Mac. Windows has now the Windows Linux Subsystem and it is actually quite good for Linux development on Windows.
I manually updated it to I don't need Cygwin anymore and it compiles to ELF format. I don't know if Microsoft will keep it but if the goal is to attract developers who deploy on Linux, it might attract all the ones that cannot migrate to Linux due to proprietary apps or don't want to tweak their system. I recently tried to use Linux Ubuntu There's no killer app for me on the Mac I don't use GarageBand or final cut pro , maybe I miss the viewer that is nice for pdf pages re-ordering or pdf merging could not find free equivalent on Windows.
So not a programmer, and not someone who was using the function keys in the first place based on that article. Furthermore he claims it's "faster than editing on any windows system" because Final Cut Pro X is integrated so well with the hardware he doesn't need more memory or CPU. Sorry, of all the applications he could've chosen, claiming that a Windows box with more memory and a better CPU would be slower is Fanboy alert. A professional blacksmith can't work without a proper anvil.
There really is something to be said about having proper tools for the job. You can't drive in a nail with a shoe, you'll need a legit hammer. SonicSoul on Nov 14, Also he's using Final Cut Pro which happens to be an Apple product so if that's faster due to integration how does that help anyone using non apple development software which I presume is majority of macbook pro users. I edit a lot of photos and I don't use any Apple software for it. TorKlingberg on Nov 14, As I understand, the new Macbook Pro has not been generally delivered yet. Is he has had one for a week, it must be through some special Apple program.
So of course he likes it, otherwise he wouldn't have received one. Apple is not saying anything like this, just a bunch of whiners twisting things. Just like they did after any Mac upgrade.
- Visual Studio for Mac | Hacker News!
- Edit the Active Cell in Excel for Mac.
- fleetwood mac give to me your leather!
- Post navigation.
The removal of a dozen keys from an already gimped keyboard is decidedly anti-developer. I am a developer and I could not care less about function keys. Why the duck would developers need function keys? Even for Vim, the age-old advice is to remap Esc so that you keep your hands on the home row.
A flexible multi-touch strip of context-aware keys can do much more things -- e. What should I do instead? Serious question. Angostura on Nov 14, Still though, at the moment I can step through code without really thinking about it, partly because I know where the keys are based on how the keyboard feels, combined with the tactile feedback of pressing the buttons.
I would worry that with no physical presence on the keyboard, I would spend a lot more time looking at the keyboard figuring out where the function key I need is than actually getting things done. I would be keen to see a review from somebody who uses the new Macbook Pro professionally as a developer to see if this is as much of an issue as I imagine it to be. In Eclipse, F5 steps into a function call, F6 steps over it, F7 returns from the current function, and F8 resumes execution, and mistakenly pressing the adjacent key can be frustrating although, with time-travel debuggers, this issue might be alleviated?
Such a tiny change, yet how much usability it destroyed - suddenly it was impossible to use F-keys by touch. With T, the spacing was back.ihatestaging.userengage.io/saga-completa-algorium-volumen-1-y-2.php
f4 excel mac – vozozesito.ga
As a touch typist, can you please explain how that would work for me? Angostura on Nov 15, It's the same argument from the Blackberry v iPhone days. Maybe not great for you. The question is - for most people are configurable F keys more useful than touch-typable F keys. As a touch typist, can you please explain how function keys are particularly relevant to touch typing?
Stepping through the debugger is not typing, and function keys change role according to the selected app anyway. Besides, there's nothing particularly hard about finding a touch based F6 key compared to a physical F6 key. A key's position which won't change gives more of a clue than the key's boundaries. Heck, it's called touch typing -- a touch strip doesn't sound that alien to it. You can feel the boundaries of physical keys, unlike virtual ones on a touchscreen.
The nubs on F and J serve a similar aligning purpose as, and enhance the functionality of, the interkey gaps on the function key row. Stepping through the debugger is not typing, I disagree. Thanks, you answered the question perfectly. I never look at the keyboard whilst typing normally. I have transitioned to using Visual Studio in the last year, and am now also developing my muscle memory of the function keys. I use a Logitech G keyboard love those Romer G switches now, even though it took a while , and e.
Actually knowing when I press the button too is extremely important; there's no mistaking the action on a physical keyboard. I also have a X1 Carbon laptop, the first gen. In its 2nd iteration, they went for capacitive function keys, much to just about everyone's chagrin. Thankfully, Lenovo listened to feedback and in its the 3rd generation the function keys are back to normal, i. If they bring a 32gb model out by the time I feel I need to upgrade, I'll probably look at another one in years. There are many applications, that do use F-keys for shortcuts.
Not only debuggers, like others mentioned. But also some popular file managers windows: Far, Total Commander; linux and osx: Midnight Commander. When using these applications, I can copy files using F5 - and I know it is F5 without looking, because it is in the middle and has an empty space to the left. Similarly with F8 delete - in the right region, has space to the right. With touch strip, you pretty much have to look away from the screen, onto the strip.
Well, no such space on the physical keyboard I'm using now. Not after F5, and not after F8. You are exception, then: Yes, there are such keyboards, from the popular ones Thinkpad [TX]30 series for example and the previous rMBP too. However, most keyboards do have the spacing. Actually Xcode has been updated for touchbar, and has some useful code editing commands. But does not show any debugging commands in the touchbar. Perhaps it will in future. It is possible to show F keys by holding the fn key and you can configure the touchbar to always show F keys by default. Are you kidding me?
How can you not see that this is nothing more than an arbitrary habit that you've grown comfortable with? Imagine the function keys had never existed to begin with. Don't you think we would have come up with a different way of stepping through code with a debugger? I understand that it's annoying to have to change your habits, but you're a developer for crying out loud: Your job is literally to change how other people do work, to make it more efficient, easier to learn and so on.
We all know that our users often resent us, because we change how they have to do their work. But we do it anyway, because we believe deeply and mostly rightly that the benefits of progress outweighs the short term annoyances of having to change habits. But when we're the ones who have to change, hoo-boy, suddenly the sky is falling.
Give me a break. Sleeping in a bed is an arbitrary habit that you've grown comfortable with , why not sleep on the floor, or in the bath? The fact is that when developing and debugging, the function keys represent the most efficient way of stepping through code, and a part of this is to do with their physical presence on the keyboard.
I know that I don't have to use them, there are other ways to achieve the same thing, but those things have always been there and I choose the function keys because they are the best option. Sleeping in a bed is an arbitrary habit that you've grown comfortable with, why not sleep on the floor, or in the bath? Because contrary to what you say, sleeping in a bed is not just an arbitrary habit. The bed is a special purpose piece of furniture, optimised for sleeping in.
The use of f-key to step through a program is OTOH simply an accident of history. The f-keys were chosen because they were there. Had they not been, some other solution would have been invented, using the keys that were there, and this is my point the solution would have been just as good! I must admit, I rarely use the function keys as they seem to be different everywhere Mainly from years of VS usage, actually But I use the escape key hundreds of times a day.. I mean nobody needs to go back, and you can just use the mouse with cut.. Because your back will hurt, so not that arbitrary after all.
You will have no adverse effects of using an alternate method to step in the debugger. They are at best a random accident. Any other keys or key combos could be used. Who are you or anyone else to decide what works best for me? Am I not capable of making my own decisions?
- F2 Excel Mac How To Copy An Exact In Excel Excel F2 Macbook Pro?
- Alt+Enter Excel on Mac.
- side dish for lobster mac and cheese.
- F2 in Excel for Mac.
- How to Use Microsoft Excel. Learn Online.!
- free visio viewer for mac os x.
- microsoft access 2011 per mac;
Do I really need a hardware company making those choices for me? Most people aren't -- from politics to personal finances and relationships, there are tons of bad decisions everywhere one looks. Including my decision to answer this comment some would say -- heh.
We have schools, best practices, guidelines, standards etc, to try to enforce some good decisions upon people. That said, if one feels strongly about it, there's always the decision NOT to buy such a laptop. Touche on Nov 14, And many people are making that decision, so what seems to be your problem with this? No problem with this. Did you not read beyond my first sentence? Who are we as programmers to decide what works best for our users? Were the clerks at the bank not capable of deciding for themselves if their pen and paper workflows worked better for them than the computer programs we made to replace them?
The typographers of yore were almost certainly more comfortable and faster using a linotype machine than this new fangled desktop publishing software, that we invented. I simply cannot wrap my head around people in our profession who kick and scream because the march of progress once in a while makes their lifes a tiny bit uncomfortable for a short while. Where did I say that? You seem confused. And your argument regarding publishing and banking software is a strawman intended to shift the focus away from the real argument - that of choice.
Forcing a change on my workflow can have very real effects on my ability to generate income. Why should anyone be ok with that? I am saying that we as programmers force people to change their habits all the time. We do it to in the name of efficiency and progress. We eliminate workflows, we make entire jobs redundant. We of all people should be able to recognise that even though change is uncomfortable, it is inevitable, and mostly for the better.
And your argument regarding publishing and banking software is a strawman intended to shift the focus away from the real argument - that of choice Please. Even if we pretend that you don't still have the option to use a third party keyboard, or buy one of the Macs that still have the f-keys, what about the people who would prefer the new touch bar to the f-keys? What about their choice?
Forcing a change on my workflow can have very real effects on my ability to generate income I'm sorry, but that's ridiculous. You are not going to feel a very real effect on your ability to generate an income simply by being forced to learn a different set of shortcut keys to step through a debugger.
How is that different to any workflow used and could be preferable by millions of people that's deprecated due to new software programs? Not to mention software that entirely kills their job and their ability to generate income from doing it altogether? Well, in this case, it's not deprecated. It's deprecated by one computer manufacturer. Other programs usually have decent alternatives or you can customise them to suit you,.
Firstly, it's not true that you don't get a choice. Apple still makes laptops with f-keys. And you can always plug in a 3rd party keyboard. Secondly, an more importantly, of all the options Apple don't give you and there are an infinite amount of them , this one is so minor. Why, other this is how you are used to it , are the important reasons for using specifically the f-keys to step through a debugger?
What is wrong with any of the other keys? I agree of course that change merely for the sake of change is not a good idea, but surely, surely we can all recognise that Apple did not make this change on whim, simply to try something different? It kind of is Sure, the features of the iPhone were great, but for my at the time primary purpose of using the device for sending emails, it as a MASSIVE step backwards. I could touch type nearly as fast on a blackberry as on a regular keyboard.
Moving to a touchscreen meant I had to look at the screen while typing. It slowed me down tremendously, and IMO was a massive step backwards in usability. It's an interesting comparison, but IMO not that apt. Going from a physical keyboard to a touch screen, something is definitely lost even though much is also gained. The removal of the function keys will at worse force people to memorise different hot keys any reason why the number row could not serve the same purpose exactly as well? They aren't just function keys. In order to Sorry, I'm just not seeing the draw. I'm also struggling to buy into the "not everyone is a touch typist" excuse.
Anyone under the age of about 40 has had a typing class. Most people "take their eyes of the monitor to use" the function keys. Given this, the function row strip will finally be more usable and more obvious for lots of other uses besides volume and brightness things that people at best adjust a dozen of times a day.
Most laptop users are neither programmers not touch typists that use the function row times a day. Nor does being a "pro" users means you are either of them.
f4 excel mac
A graphic designer might not be a touch typist or care for the f row, but he is a professional. Same for a doctor, an architect, a musician, a videographer, a CEO, an accountant, etc etc Sorry, I'm just not seeing the draw "Sorry, but I'm just not interested in this motorized wagon you've invented.
It's noisy and ugly. Could you please just go and invent me a faster horse instead? So you're comparing a touch bar, which has already been done before and met with the exact same pushback, to a radical new form of transportation? This is the next Apple Watch in the making. So, a product that went from non-existent to being the 1 sold item in it's niche, the 2 in overall watch sales, and outsold competitor smartwatches 10 to 1, becoming a multi-billion dollar thing?
And all that in it's first years it took more for the iPod to become ubiquitous from its introduction , and while not of course being expected to become the next iPhone anyway Yeah, some failure. No, I am making the observation that most users are conservative and resist change, even for the better. And that most people can't recognize progress even if it hits them in the face. Nullabillity on Nov 15, Then you lose the ability to change the code while you're debugging it, or end up with a modal UI. No thanks.
Do modifier keys control, alt, command, fn, shift fall under your definition of modal UI? If so, how do you deal with the fact that your keyboard doesn't I'm guessing have dedicated keys for cut, copy, and paste? I think its safe to assume that everybody uses those significantly more often than they step through a program with a debugger. Imagine the function keys never existed.. That made it all better. If you're using a MBP at the moment - then you're already pressing the fn key to use the functions keys for anything other than the media-stuff they've been designed around for years.
Your workflow is exactly the same - you're just using soft keys instead of physical ones. SteveMoody73 on Nov 14, Or change the preferences so the function keys work as expected and you have to use the fn key to access the media options. I probably use the function keys x more often than the media ones. There is option on Macs and basically ever other computer to flip that so Fn is required for media functionality instead.
You can change that setting, and I imagine most developers who rely on function keys do, so no I'm not already doing that. Well then it's still exactly the same? You can either press fn or change your preferences. You opted for the latter. Do that again? So the touchbar has a setting where it behaves precisely like the current MBP? Esc, row of 12 keys, which are either f1-f12 or media with a setting, and are toggled between with fn?
That's strictly worse if I only ever use it like that because it's the same but with soft keys, but sure that's basically the same. NEDM64 on Nov 16, No you don't, because this is a Mac, and macOS doesn't use the F keys ever. If you're using Windows, the F keys appear on the Touch Bar.
The debug step keys will show up in the touch bar? If they are not stupid enough to swap them around sometimes, then they should stay in the same position. Serious question Use the strip bar in debugger keys mode, or function keys mode for non-updated apps? Or use printf statements seriously -- I never advocated for much debugger use, unless it concerns very focused stepping. A lot of people step all around and examine everything and anything for ages with no clear idea of what the bug might be.
Use Fn and numbers as function keys and you're done. Steeeve on Nov 14, More than a few developers have spoken up on the issue here on HN. The escape key is commonly used, as are many other function keys. Other vendors have rolled out similar gadgets to apple and they've been rejected by the development community at large - which apple would have known because they don't implement things like that willy nilly.
Since we're talking about what is basically a rebrand of Xamarin Studio, the current release of Xamarin Studio for Mac uses the function keys for stepping in the debugger. Well, now they can use the touch bar to show those functions depending on context. Isn't that better overall for usability rather than having to remember keybinds for every action? No touch bar can replace that kind of efficiency. Maybe, but for the average user who doesn't have keybinds committed to muscle memory, the touch bar is going to be a real boon.
If I've got to constantly look between the screen and the keyboard to make sure my finger hasn't wandered off "step into" and onto "continue", then that feels much worse for usability. It seems like it would be better in the short term don't have to learn the bindings , but worse in the long term if it's something you do often no way to find the keys' edges without looking every time you press the key, with the occasional glance down again to correct for drift.
Whether that's "better overall" or not depends on individual usage patterns. Personally, I don't really stray from the alphanumeric part of the keyboard often, and I can rebind esc, so the Touchbar's mostly a moot point for me. My strongest reason to dislike it is that it adds yet another set of potential points of failure for the machine without providing for my purposes much benefit. For those apps you can just enable "function mode", if it's not already enabled by default.
Apple tinkering with the function keys has allowed the development community to recongratulate themselves with IDE it seems. Seems also that people confidently touch type debugger instruction, despite the key that you want being literally squeezed between 2 keys that will ruin you debugging session and make you lose the next 10 minutes. I think the developer community at large is more prone to overreaction. Note that I think people are going to be impacted. I think the touchbar is a downgrade for people that needs to use Windows either in the VM or Bootcamp.
I still type on an old MBP with physical F-keys and they are actually awful for touch typing. They are smaller, evenly spaced no grouped and not aligned with the lower key rows. If you are serious about touch typing potentially workflow ruining key combination like debugger ones, you must use an external keyboard already. In Terminal, I have mapped common commands that I use all the time into macros assigned to function keys. For my Ruby workflows, I have various rake commands a single key press away.
I tell you, it really is a party trick at work. You know the touch bar would have been awesome if they added it above the function key list. And used the 2nd function volume brightness etc as the default for touch bar. That way the touch bar is useful and functionality of function keys is kept. I would have bought the new mbp if that's what they did. Now I'm going to get a dell: I care. I don't remember that advice, and I never have trouble relocating my fingers in sub seconds. So you'd rather press F5 to build and F6 to debug instead of tapping "Build" or "Debug"?
Nullabillity on Nov 14, You shouldn't be looking at the keys anyway, and that becomes a lot harder if you don't have tactile feedback. I don't know if it's just the usual whining of people complaining about new things. From the exterior I'm too young and the only Mac I've ever used was the Macintosh Plus - bragging , with 4Mo of RAM- while I was a child , it really seems like Apple has dropped the ball for professionals, both developers and graphics people.
There are now equally well designed PCs laptops and desktops from other manufacturers, Windows has a lot of support, if you want to use Linux, the kernel now supports a wide range of hardware. In the meantime, Apple doesn't have a good desktop offering, and their laptops seem gimmicky to me while not offering a performance edge over their competitors. A few months ago I thought about buying a my first Macbook and waited for their announcement, now I'm looking the other way. And around me, I'm the guy people go to ask when they have a computer related purchase to make. I agree, PC manufacturers havent quite caught on that less is more at least aesthetically I see machines like the HP Spectre and feel they are still somewhat overdesigned.
Twisell on Nov 14, I don't now where you lived the past 20 years but theses are maybe the most classical arguments against mac in business. Mac have never been "for Pro" if you go that way. So I guess it confirm that it's not the company that shifted it's focus, but maybe there is more potentials customers expectation of Apple going more "pro". They may be classics, but are they wrong? Yes, Apple has never targeted businesses, but they did target individuals professionnals at some point. Video and sound editors used to work on Macs, and now move to windows. It's a classic, but is it wrong?
I guess as always it will mostly depend on your use case. However this recent announcement from IBM might emphasis the need to reconsider theses year old arguments to take accounts of new facts: I knew about that and Google's Macs. But for standards businesses with relatively technologically inept people, when you need an Active Directory, you just need it.
I feel so strange about this. On one hand microsoft stepped up their attention to individual professionals e. On the other hand, microsoft is infamous for privacy, for their forced upgrades, their updates, whereas apple emphasizes privacy. I like macbooks as laptops, but on software front apple seems to rest on their laurels and developers seem to use macbooks, either because unix or there's more money in App store than elsewhere. People aren't going to do development on a tablet or a smartphone anytime soon. Don't speak too soon. Don't be surprised if XCode for iPad Pro is a thing soon.
It's becoming clear he sees iPads as the future of computing, it's all he uses personally and developing it's own apps is one of the last things it actually can't do. You suggest you will develop any serious software without access to a file system? And on a 10 inch screen? Also developers like to you use their own tools.
That doesn't fit well with the "you will do as you are told" approach of Apple. Funny you mention that: A great development environment for me - 11 hour battery life, built in LTE connection, huge screen that I can layout how I want, easy to carry around with me and I can use it for drawing and sketching UI concepts for my clients before I start on any work. My set up proves you wrong: Nexus 7, bluetooth keyboard, a Debian chroot with git, vim, python and apt.
I take that with me to sketchy places instead of my laptop. I think a inch tablet could be more comfortable to read, but I love the Full-HD screen and pocketability of the 2nd-gen N7. I find it amazing that 3 years later and no other Android tablet has a screen resolution that's comparable. While I agree with you there is that thing for trying Swift on iPad. Kyro38 on Nov 14, It's a toy for learning, nothing more.
It could be an MVP. It is, for learning basic Swift. For developing you want to use a setup that allows you to handle thousands if not hundreds of thousands of lines of code. A single-process touch interface isn't that, I think. They opensourced a lot of codes, released Visual Studio Code,and integrated Windows with bash shell. I assume Apple is becoming less dev-oriented company, seeing they are making light of pro tools like MacPro and function keys. While I agree MS DevDiv must be an interesting place to be right now.
The Linux subsystem for Windows sucks so bad, and the windows containers for docker feels half baked as well Use the msys bash that comes with git instead. That said, I'm happy to see this and do hope to see a similar effort for Linux as many Mac users are starting to move on. Should they want to unify that.
I've been very happy with VS Code for my needs all the same. And those of us heavily dependent on UNIX tools just install homebrew and are fine as well. It's actually better than it ever was. I have no idea what these self-appointed "pros" actually do. Their work seems to involve a awful lot of swapping hardware components, attaching peripherals in a jurisdiction that frowns upon adapters, and pressing ESC.
That's quite an exaggerated presumption. Office for mac has been around for years. VSC will more than likely give sublime a run for its money as they are very similar on the Mac platform. Just because microsoft ports VS, it doesn't reveal anything other than giving developers that prefer Macs another IDE choice.
You can get a MBP without function keys and just because Apple has decided evolve their approach to the keyboard, it doesn't mean anything beyond that. It's very interesting that this has become such a hot topic in the dev community. Apple isn't abandoning devs, pure and simple. Office for Macis also a shadow of the windows version. Excel is still single threaded!!! Do most developers really need anything with a CPU more powerful than an iPhone 5 to build apps or web pages? In most cases if they do they're doing it wrong. PHPApple on Nov 14, Yes, in many cases. Building is very CPU and memory intense.
Many times you have to run local severs to debug on. I often find myself running local servers, building my apps, running my IDE, creating assets in Photoshop, and more all at once. It helps. No reason to artificially limit processing power available. If I spend seconds more waiting for my Go command line program to compile, or Rails to boot up, or a complex web page to load, or my VMs to respond, or Elasticsearch to boot etc. It's time that I can spend doing other stuff. True, but we were all using most of that same technology when a core2 duo was a top end laptop, and it's not as though productivity has gone through the roof just because we can get an i7 laptop.
Mobile CPUs are approach mobile core 2 duo performance. ReverseCold on Nov 14, The second either is added to the project, you will need a much more powerful computer. True those are slow. But I think most projects could compile a lot faster if the dependencies were compiled into a separate bundle once a day and the app code into its own bundle when it changed. But compiled environments such as. Net take a lot of cpu and memory. It's not uncommon to have visual studios open which can take up 10 gigs of ram. I'd argue that some of what you describe should probably be an anti-pattern, or is at least a byproduct of very fast, cheap CPU power.
Emacs has worked for years on much lower-end hardware and has been used to build some very elaborate systems. These days a typical developer laptop is 5x more powerful than the system the code will be used on mobile device, virtual server, etc. SonicSoul on Nov 15, I do not disagree with anything you said. The only reason for powerful developer workstations is that each second of delay is compounded when you use your machine as a tool. I do use lightweight tools but Visual Studio is still extremely powerful and not easily replaceable I've been using it every day for past 10 years.
Visual Studio is NOT fast. Especially when you add ReSharper into the mix. The fact is that lots of people still use it and a powerful machine is needed today to make those responsive. Macbook pros haven't been for 'pros' for at least 4 years: I think Microsoft is saying that they want the market, they want their products running on all platforms, and not that "Mac OS is a serious platform".
Um, Apple also makes an IDE. Jaruzel on Nov 14, Page has gone. Other people buried in the comments have posted the google cache of it, but here is it again for visibility: Maybe a Feature Request for HN, would be for a 'alt' link that mods update as part of the clickables under the post title? Since popular HN submissions will often hug the site to death, a nice feature would be to automatically check the top 3 caches archive.
If the cache doesn't , the content could be quickly parsed to check it matches the submission and, if so, automatically include the cache link at the top of the submission page. This would save people manually posting these all the time and would, in many cases prevent the case where it becomes impossible to retrieve a cache, because nobody thought to access one before the slashdot effect occurs. Or, as in this case it seems, the article is pulled. It would also be nice if, hours after submission, the only cache link remaining is archive.
It's rare, but sometimes a page will be updated so the comments no longer make sense. It would also be nice to include a link history in the same area have requested this before , in case the original submission is changed by the mod. Usually when this happens the notice is the top comment, but sometimes it isn't and the discussion can be quite confusing as a result. Or, they could just have a live link AND a cache link and let people click what they want. A story with a cache link is likely to be upvoted more, encouraging people to do it.
I wasn't suggesting only displaying the cache link, but rather providing a list of alternate links if available - not all sites allow archival, or the cache might be stale so they are always there at the top of the page. It's not exactly clear what is best netiquette regarding linking because larger sites that rely on advertising and can handle the traffic will welcome more clicks, but smaller sites would rather be cached. Better for HN not to encourage or discourage either, but give both options and let the readers decide. That webcache link is throwing a certificate error in Chrome for me.
I can't go there due to HSTS. Here's an internet archive link that works for me: Strange, not sure if this is a bug or if MS published too early and retracted it? Thanks for the tip BTW. I had linked to this from a blog post, but have now removed the dead link https: FLGMwt on Nov 14, Almost definitely the latter. It's probably going to be announced there.
Ah OK, it was probably under embargo and got posted early by mistake. I've been to Connect ; before in a time zone ahead of the US and nothing gets announced in the morning until the US wakes up and the embargo is lifted. FYI Connect ; is November 16thth starting 9: It includes the improvements they had planned for the next release but I doubt they will do a rewrite. For example, the Xamarin. Forms XAML previewer is much better.
Looking forward to a full designer. I've got a four part blog post series this week on Xamarin. Starting with this today: Visual Studio for Mac is a re-brand of Xamarin Studio. HAVE I? This will let you use the F2 key in Excel without dimming your screen. I use all my F keys as standard function keys, but I still have to use the fn key for mute, lower and raise the volume buttons. Yeeeaaaahh buddy!! No worries. As a heavy PC user, I use this program to remap most of my keys on the Mac to make the transition back and forth easier, particularly on my MacPro. When you try to open a file with the context of an application like Word, Excel, or any other application, the application will pop open an instance of the File Chooser dialog box, which is actually just another view of Finder.
So why would you have one usage be Command Open while the other is Enter? Lastly, for anyone who lives by the keyboard, having to use two hands to manipulate the keyboard to select a file is highly highly inefficient, and THAT is truly retarded. Imagine if in a photo album application, where all of the photo thumbnails were displayed, after you were able to keyboard your way to a particular photo, you had to hit Command-O to open that photo?
Again, this is for the heavy super-users. Which would you use for Delete if you didnt have an eject button? Yes, Mac Air. How do I get around this? I read that the eject key was hard-wired and that there was no way to remap it to fwd-delete. The noEjectDelay is also fantastic. Excel also works like a charm now. Hey Gregory-using Key Remap for mac and randomly the f2 will switch back to the cut function.
What is causing that? The easiest solution: It just works. Do you know how to do this on a MacBook?